Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.southwesthealthcare.com.au/swhealthcarejspui/handle/1/3539
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSwanson, Terry-
dc.contributor.authorCooper, R.-
dc.contributor.authorKeast, D. H.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-17T04:57:25Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-17T04:57:25Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.southwesthealthcare.com.au/swhealthcarejspui/handle/1/3539-
dc.description.abstractWe write in response to your excellent editorial1 Food for thought: innovation and debate. Re: Removal of the term Critical Colonisation from the wound infection continuum The International Wound Infection Institute's (IWII) decision to remove the term critical colonisation from the wound infection continuum was highlighted. We are pleased that our 2016 document Wound Infection in Clinical Practice: Principles of best practice has generated such discussion and debate.-
dc.subjectWound Care-
dc.subjectLetter-
dc.subjectResponse-
dc.titleLetters: Response to ‘Food for thought: innovation and debate’ Journal of Wound Care July 2017; 26: 7-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Wound Care-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.magonlinelibrary.com/doi/10.12968/jowc.2017.26.9.570-
dc.format.startpage570-571-
dc.source.volume26-
local.issue.number9-
dc.identifier.accessdateSep-
dc.identifier.importdoi10.12968/jowc.2017.26.9.570-
dc.contributor.swhauthorSwanson, Terry-
Appears in Collections:SWH Staff Publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing