Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.southwesthealthcare.com.au/swhealthcarejspui/handle/1/3557
Journal Title: A discrete choice experiment to examine the preferences of patients with cancer and their willingness to pay for different types of health care appointments
Authors: Wong, Shu Fen
Norman, Richard
Dunning, Trisha Lynette
Ashley, David Michael
Khasraw, Mustafa
Hayes, Theresa Margaret
Collins, Ian M.
Lorgelly, Paula Kate
SWH Author: Hayes, Theresa M.
Collins, Ian M.
Keywords: Oncology
Experiment
Appointments
Issue Date: 2016
Date Accessioned: 2023-03-17T04:57:30Z
Date Available: 2023-03-17T04:57:30Z
Url: https://jnccn.org/downloadpdf/journals/jnccn/14/3/article-p311.pdf
Format Startpage: 311-319
Source Volume: 14
Issue Number: 3
Abstract: BACKGROUND: This study sought to understand the preferences of patients with cancer and the trade-offs between appointment attributes using discrete choice experiment (DCE). METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: Patients with cancer at 3 hospitals completed a self-administered DCE. Each scenario described 6 attributes: expertise of health care professionals (HCPs), familiarity of doctors with patients' medical history, waiting time, accompaniment by family/friends, travel time, and out-of-pocket costs. Patient preferences were estimated using logistic regression. Willingness to pay (WTP) estimates were derived from regression coefficients. RESULTS: Of 512 patients contacted, 185 returned the questionnaire. The mean age was 61 years, and 60% of respondents were female. The mean time since cancer diagnosis was 34 months, 90% had received treatment; and 61% had early-stage disease. The most important attributes were expertise and familiarity of doctors with patients' medical history; distance traveled was least likely to influence patient preferences. The WTP analysis estimated that patients were willing to pay $680 (95% CI, 470-891) for an appointment with a specialist, $571 (95% CI, 388-754) for doctors familiar with their history, $422 (95% CI, 262-582) for shorter waiting times, $399 (95% CI, 249-549) to be accompanied by family/friends, and $301 (95% CI, 162-441) for shorter traveling times. Male patients had a stronger preference for accompaniment by family/friends. The expertise of HCP was the most important attribute for patients regardless of geographic remoteness. CONCLUSIONS: Our study can assist the development of patient-centered health care models that improve patient access to experienced HCPs, support the role of primary care providers during the cancer journey, and educate patients about the roles of non-oncology HCPs to cope with increasing demand for cancer care.
URI: https://repository.southwesthealthcare.com.au/swhealthcarejspui/handle/1/3557
Journal Title: Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
Type: Journal Article
Appears in Collections:SWH Staff Publications



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing