Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.southwesthealthcare.com.au/swhealthcarejspui/handle/1/3560
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWoo, Kevin-
dc.contributor.authorHill, Rosemary-
dc.contributor.authorLeBlanc, Kimberly-
dc.contributor.authorSchultz, Gregory-
dc.contributor.authorSwanson, Terry-
dc.contributor.authorWeir, Dot-
dc.contributor.authorMayer, Dieter O.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-17T04:57:31Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-17T04:57:31Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.southwesthealthcare.com.au/swhealthcarejspui/handle/1/3560-
dc.description.abstractProducts that provide a protective skin barrier play a vital role in defending the skin against the corrosive effect of bodily fluids, including wound exudate, urine, liquid faeces, stoma output and sweat. There are many products to choose from, which can be broadly categorised by ingredients. This article describes the differences in mechanisms of action between barrier products comprising petrolatum and/or zinc oxide, silicone film-forming polymers and cyanoacrylates, and compares the evidence on them. The literature indicates that all types of barrier product are clinically effective, with little comparative evidence indicating that any one ingredient is more efficacious than another, although film-forming polymers and cyanoacrylates have been found to be easier to apply and more cost-effective. However, laboratory evidence, albeit limited, indicates that a concentrated cyanoacrylate produced a more substantial and adherent layer on a porcine explant when compared with a diluted cyanoacrylate and was more effective at protecting skin from abrasion and repeated exposure to moisture than a film-forming polymer. Finally, a silicone-based cream containing micronutrients was found to significantly reduce the incidence of pressure ulceration when used as part of a comprehensive prevention strategy.; Products that provide a protective skin barrier play a vital role in defending the skin against the corrosive effect of bodily fluids, including wound exudate, urine, liquid faeces, stoma output and sweat. There are many products to choose from, which can be broadly categorised by ingredients. This article describes the differences in mechanisms of action between barrier products comprising petrolatum and/or zinc oxide, silicone film-forming polymers and cyanoacrylates, and compares the evidence on them. The literature indicates that all types of barrier product are clinically effective, with little comparative evidence indicating that any one ingredient is more efficacious than another, although film-forming polymers and cyanoacrylates have been found to be easier to apply and more cost-effective. However, laboratory evidence, albeit limited, indicates that a concentrated cyanoacrylate produced a more substantial and adherent layer on a porcine explant when compared with a diluted cyanoacrylate and was more effective at protecting skin from abrasion and repeated exposure to moisture than a film-forming polymer. Finally, a silicone-based cream containing micronutrients was found to significantly reduce the incidence of pressure ulceration when used as part of a comprehensive prevention strategy.-
dc.subjectTechnology-
dc.subjectSkin Protectants-
dc.subjectExamination-
dc.subjectWound Care-
dc.subjectWound-
dc.titleTechnological features of advanced skin protectants and an examination of the evidence base-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Wound Care-
dc.accession.numberEvidence based-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2019.28.2.110-
dc.format.startpage110-125-
dc.source.volume28-
local.issue.number2-
dc.identifier.importdoi10.12968/jowc.2019.28.2.110-
dc.contributor.swhauthorSwanson, Terry-
Appears in Collections:SWH Staff Publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing