Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://repository.southwesthealthcare.com.au/swhealthcarejspui/handle/1/3718
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Aitken, Campbell | - |
dc.contributor.author | Brough, Rodger | - |
dc.contributor.author | Crofts, Nick | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-04-12T02:09:42Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-04-12T02:09:42Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 1999 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.southwesthealthcare.com.au/swhealthcarejspui/handle/1/3718 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Most studies of injecting drug users (IDUs) have included only urban IDUs; information about rural IDUs is scarce. Recognizing this, the Victorian Injecting Drug Users Cohort Study (MCS) recruited IDUs from rural Victoria as well as Melbourne (population 3.2 million in 1995), capital city of the state of Victoria, Australia. Examination of data collected from IDUs thing in Melbourne and the Western District (largest city: Warrnambool, pop. 27 734) revealed numerous differences in behaviour and serology. The primary drug for most Western District IDUs was amphetamines while Melbourne IDUs preferred heroin. Injecting and sharing frequencies were much lower in the rural sample. Hepatitis C antibody prevalence at first test was significantly higher in Melbourne IDUs, although this was clearly related to the difference in primary drugs; conversely, incidence among Western District amphetamine injectors was 16.2 per 100 person-years (py) (during 18.5 py), yet no conversions occurred in metropolitan amphetamine injectors in 29.8 py. Western District IDUs were less educated and more likely to be unemployed and of aboriginal descent than metropolitan IDUs. Variation between populations of Victorian IDUs has implications for the delivery of IDU-related health services; of particular concern is the possibility that hepatitis C has been spreading relatively rapidly among rural IDUs. | - |
dc.language.iso | English | - |
dc.subject | Aboriginal | - |
dc.subject | Amphetamine | - |
dc.subject | Amphetamine Derivative | - |
dc.subject | Antibody Titer | - |
dc.subject | Australia | - |
dc.subject | Blood | - |
dc.subject | City | - |
dc.subject | Cohort Analysis | - |
dc.subject | Diamorphine | - |
dc.subject | Drug Use | - |
dc.subject | Examination | - |
dc.subject | Health Service | - |
dc.subject | Hepatitis C | - |
dc.subject | Antibody | - |
dc.subject | Population | - |
dc.subject | Serology | - |
dc.subject | Virus | - |
dc.title | Injecting drug use and blood-borne viruses: A comparison of rural and urban Victoria, 1990-95 | - |
dc.type | Journal Article | - |
dc.identifier.journaltitle | Drug and Alcohol Review | - |
dc.identifier.url | https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09595239996752 | - |
dc.description.affiliation | C. Aitken, Epidemiol. and Social Research Unit, Macfarlane Burnet Ctr. for Med. Res., PO Box 254, Fairfield, Vic. 3078, Australia | - |
dc.format.startpage | 47-52 | - |
dc.source.volume | 18 | - |
local.issue.number | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.importdoi | https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09595239996752 | - |
dc.identifier.date | 1999 | - |
Appears in Collections: | SWH Staff Publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.