Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.southwesthealthcare.com.au/swhealthcarejspui/handle/1/4172
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGately, Lucy-
dc.contributor.authorMesia, C.-
dc.contributor.authorSepúlveda, J. M.-
dc.contributor.authordel Barco, S.-
dc.contributor.authorPineda, E.-
dc.contributor.authorGironés, R.-
dc.contributor.authorFuster, J.-
dc.contributor.authorDumas, M.-
dc.contributor.authorGill, S.-
dc.contributor.authorNavarro, L. M.-
dc.contributor.authorHerrero, A.-
dc.contributor.authorDowling, A.-
dc.contributor.authorde las Peñas, R.-
dc.contributor.authorVaz, M. A.-
dc.contributor.authorAlfonso, M.-
dc.contributor.authorLwin, Z.-
dc.contributor.authorHarrup, R.-
dc.contributor.authorPeralta, S.-
dc.contributor.authorLong, A.-
dc.contributor.authorPerez-Segura, P.-
dc.contributor.authorAhern, E.-
dc.contributor.authorGarate, C. O.-
dc.contributor.authorWong, M.-
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, R.-
dc.contributor.authorCuff, K.-
dc.contributor.authorJennens, R.-
dc.contributor.authorGallego, O.-
dc.contributor.authorUnderhill, C.-
dc.contributor.authorMartinez-Garcia, M.-
dc.contributor.authorCovela, M.-
dc.contributor.authorCooper, A.-
dc.contributor.authorBrown, S.-
dc.contributor.authorRosenthal, M.-
dc.contributor.authorTorres, J.-
dc.contributor.authorGibbs, P.-
dc.contributor.authorBalana, C.-
dc.contributor.authorCollins, Ian M.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-22T03:41:50Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-22T03:41:50Z-
dc.date.issued2024-04-17-
dc.identifier.issn0167-594X Printen
dc.identifier.issn1573-7373 Electronicen
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.southwesthealthcare.com.au/swhealthcarejspui/handle/1/4172-
dc.description.abstractPurpose The impact of age on optimal management of glioblastoma remains unclear. A recent combined analysis of two randomised trials, GEINO14-01 and EX-TEM, found no benefit from extending post-radiation temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Here, we explore the impact of age. Methods Relevant intergroup statistics were used to identify differences in tumour, treatment and outcome characteristics based on age with elderly patients (EP) defined as age 65 years and over. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. Results Of the combined 205 patients, 57 (28%) were EP. Of these, 95% were ECOG 0–1 and 65% underwent macroscopic resection compared with 97% and 61% of younger patients (YP) respectively. There were numerically less MGMT-methylated (56% vs. 63%, p = 0.4) and IDH-mutated (4% vs. 13%, p = 0.1) tumours in EP vs. YP. Following surgery, EP were more likely to receive short course chemoradiation (17.5% vs. 6%, p = 0.017). At recurrence, EP tended to receive or best supportive care (28.3% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.09) or non-surgical options (96.2% vs. 84.6%, p = 0.06), but were less likely to receive bevacizumab (23.1% vs. 49.5%, p < 0.01). Median PFS was similar at 9.3months in EP and 8.5months in YP, with similar median OS at 20months. Conclusion In this trial population of predominantly fit EP, survival was similar to YP despite a proportion receiving less aggressive therapy at diagnosis and recurrence. Advancing age does not appear to be an adverse prognostic factor for glioblastoma when patients are fit for treatment, and a less aggressive approach in selected patients may not compromise outcomes.en
dc.publisherJournal of Neuro-Oncologyen
dc.subjectOncologyen
dc.subjectGeriatricsen
dc.subjectTrialen
dc.subjectGlioblastomaen
dc.subjectTreatmenten
dc.subjectCanceren
dc.subjectNeurologyen
dc.titleExploring management and outcomes of elderly patients with glioblastoma using data from two randomised trials (GEINO1401/EX-TEM)en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.publisher.placeInternationalen
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Neuro-Oncologyen
dc.accession.number10.1007en
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-024-04668-5en
dc.source.volume167en
local.issue.number2en
dc.identifier.databaseSpringer Linken
dc.identifier.importdoi10.1007/s11060-024-04668-5en
dc.contributor.swhauthorCollins, Ian M.-
dc.relation.departmentOncology-
dc.relation.departmentNeurology-
Appears in Collections:SWH Staff Publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing