Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://repository.southwesthealthcare.com.au/swhealthcarejspui/handle/1/3799
Journal Title: | A Victorian clinician-based survey on current practices for breast cancer staging in pregnancy 46th Annual Scientific Meeting, Urological Cancer; Age and Gender in Cancer Practice; Digital Health in Cancer. Adelaide, SA Australia. |
Authors: | Herbison, Harriet Miller, Abigail Hart, Christopher D. Hayes, Theresa M. Shnier, Darryl Stewart, Josphine Teo, Lee Na Thomson, Jacqui Torres, Javier Greenberg, Sally Devitt, Bianca |
SWH Author: | Hayes, Theresa M. |
Keywords: | Abdomen Adult Advanced Cancer Bone Scintiscanning Breast Cancer Cancer Patient Cancer Radiotherapy Cancer Staging Cancer Surgery Conference Controlled Study Female Human Liver Major Clinical Study Medical Oncology Overall Response Rate Pelvis Practice Guideline Pregnancy Pregnant Woman Questionnaire Radiation Oncologist Radiologist Spine Surgeon Thorax Radiography Ultrasound MRI Work Experience |
Issue Date: | 2019 |
Date Accessioned: | 2023-04-12T02:10:02Z |
Date Available: | 2023-04-12T02:10:02Z |
Url: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajco.13263 |
Description Affiliation: | H. Herbison, Oncology Department, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC, Australia |
Format Startpage: | 172 |
Source Volume: | 15 |
Issue Number: | Supplement 9 |
Database: | Embase |
DOI: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajco.13263 |
Date: | 2019 |
Abstract: | Background/aims: Incidence of cancer during pregnancy is rising.1 There is limited evidence, and no national guidelines regarding when to perform staging andwhich imaging modalities are safe and accurate during pregnancy. This study assesses current Victorian clinician practices for staging of pregnant women with breast cancer. Method(s): A study specific survey was administered to medical oncologists, surgeons, radiation oncologists, radiologists and specialty trainees at breast multidisciplinary meetings across regional and metropolitan Victoria. The questionnaire assessed clinician level of work experience, perceived indications for staging, and preferred imaging modalities in breast cancer patients who are pregnant. Result(s): One hundred three questionnaires were completed with an overall response rate of 87%. Eighty-seven cancer specialists (35 surgeons, 33 medical oncologists, 12 radiologists, seven radiation oncologists) and 16 trainees completed the survey. 76(74%) of clinicians had worked in their field for >6 years and 65(63%) had treated at least one pregnant woman with breast cancer. Two per cent of clinicians would not stage during pregnancy. Sixty-one (59%) would stage in locally advanced or inflammatory, 56(54%) in clinical node involvement, 79(77%) if strongly suspicious of metastatic disease. Fifty per cent and 59% of clinicians would order chest X-ray and liver ultrasound, respectively. Less frequently selected tests included CT chest (11%), whole spine MRI (8%), whole body MRI (8%), whole body bone scan (5%), andCT abdomen and pelvis (1%).87%of clinicians would like local or national guidelines in this area. Conclusion(s): There is variability in clinical practice for staging pregnant women with breast cancer. The majority of clinicians surveyed believe guidelines arewarranted.We plan to develop consensus guidelines on the use of imaging for staging of pregnant women with breast cancer. |
URI: | https://repository.southwesthealthcare.com.au/swhealthcarejspui/handle/1/3799 |
Journal Title: | Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology |
Type: | Conference Paper |
Conference Name: | 46th Annual Scientific Meeting, Urological Cancer; Age and Gender in Cancer Practice; Digital Health in Cancer. |
Conference Location: | Adelaide, SA Australia. |
Appears in Collections: | SWH Staff Publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.